LEARN WHY AMENDMENT 3
IS
WRONG FOR MISSOURI

BABIES CAN FEEL PAIN

AT 12 WEEKS

Amendment 3 contains absolutely no protections or safeguards for unborn children. It assumes that pregnancy involves only one patient—the pregnant mom—while ignoring the basic medical reality that the child before birth should also be acknowledged and cared for.  This extreme amendment would legalize abortion through all nine months of pregnancy, while allowing the possibility of regulating abortion after “fetal viability.” However, a statement from the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists indicates “it is impossible to definitively declare viability” and that the organization “strongly discourages the inclusion of viability in legislation or regulation.” Current neuroscientific evidence suggests a fetus (“fetus” is the Latin word for “unborn child”) may experience pain as early as 12 weeks, well before the arbitrary standard of “viability” proposed in this amendment. A fetal child may not experience pain in exactly the same way as an adult, but she does indeed experience pain as a real sensation. The unborn child’s humanity and ability to experience pain is completely disregarded by amendment 3.

AMENDMENT 3 ALLOWS

MEN IN WOMEN’S SPACES

Amendment 3 would also open the door to allowing biological males who identify as transgender females to enter girls’ locker rooms, use women’s restrooms, and participate on girls’ sports teams. Abortion-rights advocates may claim this amendment is only intended to affect women’s rights, but the wording suggests otherwise. The amendment states the Government may not “infringe upon a person’s fundamental right to reproductive freedom.” As “person” clearly includes males as well as females, the amendment would be used to create new constitutional rights for transgender “women” (biological males) who demand access to traditionally “women-only” spaces. Thus, an amendment supposedly protecting “women’s rights” will turn into a vehicle for males to invade private spaces and activities previously belonging solely to biological females.

AMENDMENT 3 IS

ABORTION ON-DEMAND

Amendment 3 is abortion on demand, for any reason, including as a method of birth control. It even allows sex selective abortion where the parents are unhappy with the baby’s gender. It also permits late-term abortions for “mental health” reasons, and provides no legal protection for fully viable babies who survive a failed abortion attempt. The State would be unable to prohibit partial birth abortions, a horrific practice where much of the baby’s body is delivered and the child’s skull is then crushed or her brain is suctioned out. Amendment 3 would also abolish health and safety regulations as well as local zoning provisions for abortion facilities. Women who are injured would be unable to sue incompetent abortion providers for negligence and malpractice. Non-physicians would also be permitted to do abortions, increasing the risk of injury to the mother.

Parents would be shut out of having a legal say in what happens to their minor children. Current state law requires minors to obtain parental consent before having an abortion or undergoing gender-altering procedures.  Amendment 3 would be used to strip parental rights and give minors a right to obtain any type of "reproductive" medical care, including birth control, abortion, and gender-altering procedures, all without parental knowledge or consent. That is because the amendment creates a "fundamental right to reproductive freedom" for ALL persons (including children) with NO exceptions or limitations based on age. Minors are not allowed to get their ears pierced or have other medical treatment without parental consent, but this amendment would crush parental rights, granting minors unrestricted access to abortion and gender-transition treatment. As has happened in other states, parents could lose custody of their minor child simply for opposing the child’s desire to be a different gender. .

PARENTS WILL BE SHUT-OUT 

Because of the extremely broad way Amendment 3 is worded, it is very likely that taxpayers would be forced to pay for abortions and gender-transition procedures. This is because abortion supporters will claim that bans on public funding of abortion and gender-altering procedures hinder the “fundamental reproductive right” created by the amendment. Supporters of this amendment have even admitted in court that it could be used to overturn existing state law prohibiting public funds being used to pay for abortions, thus forcing public funding of abortion and transgender medical treatments. Even many people who generally favor legal abortion are appalled at the idea of being required against their will to help pay for this procedure.

TAX-PAYER FUNDED

ABORTIONS

Amendment 3 would overrule current state law that prohibits gender transition procedures such as genital-altering surgeries and puberty-blocking hormones on minors. This law was passed after a whistleblower employee at a Missouri Transgender Center came forward and accused the facility of  dispensing drugs to children against their parents’ wishes, administering cross-sex hormones to mentally ill children, and ignoring the deteriorating physical and mental health conditions of patients. The amendment creates a new “fundamental right to reproductive freedom” with NO limitations based on the age at which these “freedoms” apply. As a result, it would mandate that minors may receive so-called “gender-affirming” care including powerful hormones and dangerous genital-mutilating surgeries that cause irreversible sterility—all without parental knowledge or consent.

WOULD LEGALIZE

DANGEROUS GENDER

SURGERIES FOR MINORS

More Resources

MAKE AN IMPACT TODAY